Re: Stupid Linux Distributions

david parsons (o.r.c@p.e.l.l.p.o.r.t.l.a.n.d.o.r.u.s)
16 May 1999 11:54:31 -0700


In article <linux.kernel.Pine.LNX.4.10.9905151403420.24731-100000@mtrausch.wcnet.org>,
Michael B. Trausch <mtrausch@wcnet.org> wrote:
>Ugh. Why do they have to patch the kernel before they send it off in a
>distribtuion?

a) Adding new features that aren't in the baseline kernel:
The Mastodon kernel (2.0.28) is patched to include my
new.new.mem memory patch (essential), the boot logo patch
(ditto), the WebShield let-every-ethernet-driver-
autoprobe-because-its-Unix-damnit patch (ditto), a hack to the
ide driver so that it won't arbitrarily trim the disk size of
large disks (ditto), a whole bunch of 2.0.36 ethernet drivers
(ditto), a bunch of other patches that get rid of (IMO)
useless driver initialization messages (not essential, but
nice), and probably a few more that I can't think of offhand.

b) Unpatched Linux kernel Makefiles (2.0.x) won't compile on
Mastodon, because they have GNUisms in them. (things like
``find <something> -maxdepth'' makes Berkeley find laugh
hysterically, (k)sh doesn't do ``if hash encaps'' the same
way bash does; I've still not figured out why menuconfig
doesn't work at all, but at least I can point users at
xconfig, because tk just works.)

____
david parsons \bi/ make menuconfig gives a single-line menu, which is
\/ not exactly useful.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/