RE: performance & you-know-who

BROWN Nick (Nick.BROWN@coe.int)
Mon, 10 May 1999 19:21:50 +0200


>Their NT "enterprise-class setup" is apparently using a FAT
filesystem and
>only connecting to w95/w98 clients because that is where NT does
best
>(none of this silly security crap ;)

MS's attempts to have their cake and eat it in the security area, are
breathtaking. On the one hand they tout NT as a nice secure desktop
environment, with zero-administration kits etc etc. On the other hand,
whenever someone discovers yet another security hole allowing user X to
become an administrator, they wheel out a marketroid to say (this happened
two weeks ago, wish I'd kept the URL) "well, since most desktop users are
local admins of their workstation anyway, it's an academic point".

Hell, on our site, the _only_ reason people are admins of their local PC is
so they can install patches to Office 97, which needs (duhhhh) admin
privileges to install or update.

Nick Brown, Strasbourg, France (Nick(dot)Brown(at)coe(dot)int)

__________________________________________________________

email address updates : @coe.int replaces @coe.fr
for more information, http://dct.coe.int/info/emfci001.htm
__________________________________________________________

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/