Re: forking

System Administrator (admin@intergrafix.net)
Thu, 22 Apr 1999 23:02:45 -0400 (EDT)


i increased to 1024..everything seems to work good so far..thanx! :)

-Cygnus
.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-.
Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer
admin@intergrafix.net Intergrafix Internet Services

"Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today"
http://cygnus.ncohafmuta.com http://www.intergrafix.net
.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-.

On Thu, 22 Apr 1999, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 21 Apr 1999 08:47:12 -0400 (EDT), System Administrator
> <admin@intergrafix.net> said:
>
> > [admin@cygnus admin]$ ./fork
> > ...
> > Forks = 37
>
> > [admin@cygnus admin]$ ps aux | wc -l
> > 472
>
> 472 + 37 == 509. Except the "ps aux | wc" counts as two processes, the
> ./fork is only one, so you only had 508 during the first test.
> MIN_TASKS_LEFT_FOR_ROOT defaults to 4, and the NR_TASKS upper limit
> defaults to 512.
>
> 508 + 4 = 512.
> tasks_I_had_running + tasks_left_for_root = max_nr_tasks.
>
> Everything adds up: this is expected behaviour if you don't increase
> NR_TASKS. You can increase NR_TASKS in include/linux/tasks.h (but not
> too much: I think you hit LDT limits above about 4090, though Ingo has a
> patch to remove that limit).
>
> --Stephen
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/