Re: [patch] some buffer.c glitches

Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@e-mind.com)
Mon, 5 Apr 1999 03:13:12 +0200 (CEST)


On Mon, 5 Apr 1999, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

>-} bdf_prm = {{40, 500, 64, 256, 15, 30*HZ, 5*HZ, 1884, 2}};
>+} bdf_prm = {{80, 500, 64, 256, 15, 5*HZ, 5*HZ, 1884, 2}};
^^
I did some test writing to block device directly and while 80 worked
stable, probably is better to use a `50' in such bdf_prm field to get a
more performant system...

Andrea Arcangeli

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/