Re: NetGear FA310TX/tulip.c

Dave Weis (djweis@plconline.com)
Thu, 25 Mar 1999 12:53:13 -0600 (CST)


> Now I'm really curious, because the machines I'm putting them
> are pretty close to exclusively VIA-based, and the only downtime
> the any of them have had (in the past 90 days, which is when I
> got the 8-pack and started installing the chips) have been when
> nfsd jammed up talking to a AIX machine and I had to reboot the
> file server to get socket 2049 out of CLOSE_WAIT.

The machine is stable except for power failures.

> We are talking about the same tulips and VIA chipsets, I hope?
> The Netgear cards I've got have one nearly tulip sized chip
> on them titled:
>
> NETGEAR
> NGMC1698
> 9843
> AN6258.1

That's exactly the same as mine, down to the date code (except the 8 on
the last line is actually a B).

> which is described in hinv (on the server, which I'll describe
> exclusively, because it's been running longest and has the most
> to lose if the card turns out to be icky) as
>
> eth0: Lite-On 82c168 PNIC
> eth0: MII transceiver found

My logs are long since rotated, but that looks familiar.

> And the VIA chipset I've got on the motherboards (FIC PA2013)
> is Vendor id 1106, Device id 586, which dmesg reports as
>
> ide: VT82C586 VXPRO+ (Apollo) on PCI bus 0 function 57
> ide0: BM-DMA at 0x6400-0x6407
> ide1: BM-DMA at 0x6408-0x640f
> hda: IBM-DTTA-351350, 8063MB w/464kB Cache, CHS=1644/255/63, DMA
> hdc: IBM-DTTA-351350, 8063MB w/464kB Cache, CHS=16383/16/63, DMA
>
>
> Of course, I'm not running 2.2.x on this machine; I'm running a much
> hacked 2.0.28, with the startup logo patch, the Webshield "this is Unix,
> so yes it's okay to have network modules autoprobe" patch, one of the
> VIA chipset DMA patches, my new.new.memory patch, a patch so that the
> IDE driver doesn't screw up disk geometry by trying to outguess the
> IBM drives, and a large crop of additional and backported 2.0.3x and
> 2.2.x drivers (including the netgear-tweaked tulip.c)
>

I tried a wide array of drivers - kernel, vendor supplied, and newer one
from Donald Becker.

The box has a Amptron 8600B motherboard, Cyrix 6x86MX, bogomips are 166 so
I think it was a 166 mhz machine.

> So, as you can see, I'm rather surprised to hear that this particular
> combination of hardware is BAD, given that it's not yet bitten me in
> the ass.

Hmmm, it most definitely didn't function, as evidenced by the mark in the
wall the airborne card caused. :-)

dave

-- 
David Weis                | 10520 New York Ave, Des Moines, IA 50322
djweis@plconline.com      | Voice 515-278-0133 Ext 231
http://www.plconline.com/ | "Great spirits will always encounter violent
                          | opposition from mediocre minds" - Einstein

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/