Re: disk head scheduling

Bob Taylor (brtaylor@inreach.com)
Fri, 19 Mar 1999 13:29:16 -0800


In message <Pine.LNX.4.05.9903191812120.1077-100000@cyril.iaeste.dk>,
Henrik Ol
sen writes:

[snip]

> Since all modern harddiscs lie faster than a politician in an election
> year when asked about their geometry, the very idea of knowing enough
> about the track boundaries to switch sort direction within each track is
> absurd.

What I would like to see is a valid test of the difference between what
is there now and no structured reads/writes. The test should simulate a
normal usage of the disk, that is, if you can determine it. My gut feeling
is that a lot of code is being wasted here for little or no return.

Bob

-- 
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bob Taylor             Email: brtaylor@inreach.com            |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| Like the ad says, at 300 dpi you can tell she's wearing a     |
| swimsuit. At 600 dpi you can tell it's wet. At 1200 dpi you   |
| can tell it's painted on. I suppose at 2400 dpi you can tell  |
| if the paint is giving her a rash. (So says Joshua R. Poulson)|
+---------------------------------------------------------------+

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/