Re: [OFFTOPIC]: MS Porting Office to Linux?

David B. Rees (dbr@spoke.nols.com)
Thu, 18 Mar 1999 15:47:07 -0800 (PST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Bjorn Ekwall: "Last pre-release of modutils? modutils-2.2.2-pre3"
Previous message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: [PATCH]: for discussion - buffer cache growth"
In reply to: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH: "Re: [OFFTOPIC]: MS Porting Office to Linux?"

On 18-Mar-99 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
>
> The "political" issue is that glibc2.1 can't be built with gcc 2.8.1;
> presumably it needs to be rewritten to be compatible with gcc 2.8.1 instead
> of requiring egcs.

glibc2.1.1pre1 can be built with gcc 2.8.1... I don't think that they've
rewritten it, though. Probably just fixed a few bugs. YMMV.

-Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Bjorn Ekwall: "Last pre-release of modutils? modutils-2.2.2-pre3"
Previous message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: [PATCH]: for discussion - buffer cache growth"
In reply to: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH: "Re: [OFFTOPIC]: MS Porting Office to Linux?"