Re: [OFFTOPIC]: MS Porting Office to Linux?

CaT (cat@zip.com.au)
Fri, 19 Mar 1999 01:05:18 +1100 (EST)

Horst von Brand wrote the following:
>
> CaT <cat@zip.com.au> said:
> > Harald Koenig wrote the following:
>
> [...]
>
> > > so, when will glibc 2.1 really be available and which "political issues"
> > > have to be worked out (for more than a month now) ?
>
> AFAIU, the trouble is that it won't build with gcc-2.8.1

As I basically said in a private mail: So what?

> > Yeah. I'm kinda suprised about that not being resolved yet. Basically
> > you had to have been lucky. Either you got it before it was withdrawn,
> > you managed to find it in some dark corner of the net or you managed
> > to get it off a friend who got it. Other then that you're SOL.
>
> ftp://sourceware.cygnus.com/pub/glibc/, currently 2.1.1pre1

Yup. Got told about that. Thought the official site was ftp.gnu.org. Now
I know better. :)

Thanks to all who told me better. :)

-- 
CaT (cat@zip.net.au)                       URL: http://www.zip.com.au/dev/null


   An electricity provider of New Hampshire, US has advised it's customers
   that in the event of a power failure they can log on to its website for
   more information...   - Paraphrased from the New Scientist, Feb 6, 1999




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/