> You said:
>
> > As far as I can decipher from the error message linux/un.h was included
> > in sys/un.h I have no idea why.
> Maybe because you are using old unsupported /usr/include headers which
> came with old unsupported version of libc?
>
> The industry leader (i.e. Red Hat) use new glibc which has correct
> headers. My personal advice -- either use Red Hat or do everything
> manually properly, starting from the bootsector and ending with
> applications.
Please, stop spreading hogwash - there are options beyond those
two. FYI: RH is not the only distribution using glibc. Debian also uses
it, for one. Moreover, "everything from bootsector" bit is pure BS -
installing glibc is not a rocket science. BTW, WTF does "industry leader"
mean?
Sheesh... It's really getting to nerves. I have nothing against Red Hat,
but some of their, erm, happy customers...
I'll abstain from giving personal advice regarding what to do with your
one. Please, get a clue - it may help you to avoid making a fool of
yourself.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/