Thats the wrong package. The dynamic linker comes with glibc.
> If a 'newer' ld.so doesn't work it is broken. This version works just
> fine with my multiple 'C' libraries.
Just that you are totally wrong again. It might be better asking qiestions
rather than just calling something broken, esp. if one does not have a
clue.
> So I should update it?? And if I do, it won't work? Is this the story?
> This one was updated in May of last year.
No, the story is that the dynamic linker for glibc is part of glibc.
> Its README states, in part; "... the main focus of this package is to
> ease the transition to libc6." They seem to have done just fine.
Jepp. It won't break if it has to use libc6 libraries together with libc5.
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg@goof.com |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/