Re: POSIX RT

Richard Gooch (rgooch@atnf.csiro.au)
Tue, 16 Mar 1999 16:54:43 +1100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: H.J. Lu: "Re: [patch] EXT2 inode.i_generation patch"
Previous message: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: [patch] EXT2 inode.i_generation patch"
Next in thread: yodaiken@chelm.cs.nmt.edu: "Re: POSIX RT"
Reply: yodaiken@chelm.cs.nmt.edu: "Re: POSIX RT"

yodaiken@chelm.cs.nmt.edu writes:
> The POSIX "minimal" standard is actually very close to what RTL offers
> and is what some other "POSIX" rt systems like LynxOs seem to follow.
> The "multi" standard includes all the problematical stuff. How useful
> would it be to have "minimal" on its own?

So what exactly are the "minimal" and "multi" standards?

Regards,

Richard....

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: H.J. Lu: "Re: [patch] EXT2 inode.i_generation patch"
Previous message: Chris Wedgwood: "Re: [patch] EXT2 inode.i_generation patch"
Next in thread: yodaiken@chelm.cs.nmt.edu: "Re: POSIX RT"
Reply: yodaiken@chelm.cs.nmt.edu: "Re: POSIX RT"