> That's not a SO problem. That's a glibc problem.
No it's not. It's a SO problem. It relies on features in glibc-2.0.7 which
are not present in glibc-2.1. The glibc boys ('n gals) assures me that if
they did not do that, *and* did it right, there would not have been any
problems installing SO on a glibc-2.1 system. And as such, SO developers
_are_ a bunch of lamers. The majority of glibc binaries don't have such
problems because they don't go right into the glibc internals.
> david parsons \bi/ Sigh. Static linking -- just say YES.
Nice idea but impracticable for a suite as large as SO. Fuck it, I'm
getting Applixware 4.4.1 to try out.
Cheers,
Alex
-- /_/\ Legalise cannabis now! ( o.o ) Grow some cannabis today! > ^ < Peace, Love, Unity and Respect to all.http://www.tahallah.demon.co.uk - *Updated* New additions in Humour section
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/