Re: struct stat

ralf@uni-koblenz.de
Fri, 12 Mar 1999 10:13:08 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Michael K. Johnson: "Two new versions of procps"
Previous message: fjjvh@wxs.nl: "frames for drivers (net(-protocol stack)/scsi/sound/etc. modules etc.)"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: struct stat"

On Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 11:18:45PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:

> > If a 64-bit device number is desired, why not declare it
> > "long long" explicitly? Why all this hiding behind __GNUC__?
>
> Because long long isnt ansi

It's in the current draft and many if not most compilers already support it.

Ralf

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Michael K. Johnson: "Two new versions of procps"
Previous message: fjjvh@wxs.nl: "frames for drivers (net(-protocol stack)/scsi/sound/etc. modules etc.)"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: struct stat"