Re: pgcc -mpentium and kernel 2.2.3

Jim Woodward (jim@jim.southcom.com.au)
Fri, 12 Mar 1999 08:26:41 +1100 (EST)


On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, mike burrell wrote:

> On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Jim Woodward wrote:
>
> |
> | Justa general question, I decied to try (out of interest)
> | compiling a kernel with -mpentium instead of -m486 in the
> | ./arch/i386/Makefile
> |
> | it seems to work.. but is there any reason why I wouldnt wanna do this for
> | stability and/or timing reasons?
>
> Only for the fact that it'll make broken kernels now and then. If it'll
> boot, you're probably OK, but I've found that pgcc makes so many broken
> kernels that it's not worth my while...too much hit and miss. If you need
> that extra 0.02% performance boost, though, go nuts.

About the only problem i experianced was the libc5 version of netscape
cmmunicator 4.51 was a little more unstable (may be unrelated) - the older
4.05 netscape is pretty solid..

Im running a libc6/Redhat 5.2 system.

--
"Microsoft is to software what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking"
  _______________________________________________________________________
 | name: james woodward (jim@jim.southcom.com.au)                        |
 |  www: http://www.jim.southcom.com.au, http://www.toto.southcom.com.au |
 |  www: http://www.mailbag.southcom.com.au                              |
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/