> Ok I've put up a 2.2.3ac1. For most people this is probably not terribly
> exciting which is good, cos it means the Linus tree is working nicely.
>
> It contains
>
> (...)
>
> o Misc include/time wrap bug fixes
Would that mean the clock() / sys_times() issue? If so, will the patch
also make it to the 2.0.37 (which, with all likelihood, will face the 248
day uptime barrier many times ;) ?
This would be good to know, since AFAIK there is an ugly work-around for
this in times() in the current devel glibc.
-- v --
v@iki.fi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/