Re: which is faster (modules or monolithic)?

Tim Waugh (tim@cyberelk.demon.co.uk)
Wed, 10 Mar 1999 19:47:16 +0000 (GMT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Andrzej Krzysztofowicz: "xconfig 2.2.[23] patch ..."
Previous message: B. James Phillippe: "Re: Problems with ATA FLASH MEMORY"
In reply to: Helge Hafting: "Re: which is faster (modules or monolithic)?"

On Wed, 10 Mar 1999, Helge Hafting wrote:

> much anyway. Your 32M machine will probably not see much difference between
> a 1M kernel and a 2M kernel.

..and using modules certainly won't save you as much as a megabyte!

Tim.
*/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrzej Krzysztofowicz: "xconfig 2.2.[23] patch ..."
Previous message: B. James Phillippe: "Re: Problems with ATA FLASH MEMORY"
In reply to: Helge Hafting: "Re: which is faster (modules or monolithic)?"