> OK, that makes sense. Actually I would do the following: have a
>sysctl-controllable amount of slack. That is, add atomic_t
But you'll never find an alien changing such sysctl. I don't care to have
a sysctl for things that nobody cares. For example the only compliant
about the old behavior was the panic issue ;).
Andrea Arcangeli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/