Re: Kernel toplevel makefile

Keith Owens (kaos@ocs.com.au)
Wed, 24 Feb 1999 00:37:12 +1200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Michael K Vance: "Re: Bug in new vfat code"
Previous message: Eduard Soriano: "RAID V Current status"
Maybe in reply to: Mike A. Harris: "Kernel toplevel makefile"

On Tue, 23 Feb 1999 08:15:21 -0500 (EST),
"Mike A. Harris" <mharris@ican.net> wrote:
>KERNELRELEASE=$(VERSION).$(PATCHLEVEL).$(SUBLEVEL)$(EXTRAVERSION)
>
>Shouldn't the end be this instead?:
>
>$(SUBLEVEL)-$(EXTRAVERSION)

No, a kernel without extraversion would be "2.2.2-". Define
"EXTRAVERSION = -whatever" instead.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Michael K Vance: "Re: Bug in new vfat code"
Previous message: Eduard Soriano: "RAID V Current status"
Maybe in reply to: Mike A. Harris: "Kernel toplevel makefile"