Re: revision control for the kernel (BitKeeper)

Larry McVoy (lm@bitmover.com)
Mon, 22 Feb 1999 09:42:33 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Peter Green: "More linux-2.0.36 gpf's"
Previous message: John Fulmer: "Re: AMD K6-2/400 and FIC VA-503+BM with Linux 2.0.36"
Maybe in reply to: Larry McVoy: "revision control for the kernel (BitKeeper)"
Next in thread: Larry McVoy: "Re: revision control for the kernel (BitKeeper)"

: I know that compression ratio is important, but at least for me
: (still using a slow PODP83, and maybe may others too) CPU usage is
: at least as important.

The compression will be optional.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Peter Green: "More linux-2.0.36 gpf's"
Previous message: John Fulmer: "Re: AMD K6-2/400 and FIC VA-503+BM with Linux 2.0.36"
Maybe in reply to: Larry McVoy: "revision control for the kernel (BitKeeper)"
Next in thread: Larry McVoy: "Re: revision control for the kernel (BitKeeper)"