Kerneld vs. kmod in 2.2.x

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: David Woodhouse: "Re: Q2: Framebuffer?"
• Previous message: Richard Jones: "Re: fsync on large files"
• Next in thread: Khimenko Victor: "Re: Kerneld vs. kmod in 2.2.x"
• Maybe reply: Khimenko Victor: "Re: Kerneld vs. kmod in 2.2.x"

So , I upgraded my 2.0.x system to a 2.2.x kernel ( 2.2.2-pre4 ).

I selected modules support , no symbol versioning and kmod.

I forgot to remove kerneld ( 2.1.121 ) from my rc scripts,
but discovered that it works OK.

The modules are loaded on demand and removed after use.

Is this normal ?
Can I continue to use kerneld and remove kmod from kernel ?
Any other comment ?

--
David Balazic , student
E-mail   : 1stein@writeme.com     |     living in  sLOVEnija
home page: http://surf.to/stein
Computer: Amiga 1200 + Quantum LPS-340AT
--

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/






 Next message: David Woodhouse: "Re: Q2: Framebuffer?"
 Previous message: Richard Jones: "Re: fsync on large files"

 Next in thread: Khimenko Victor: "Re: Kerneld vs. kmod in 2.2.x"
 Maybe reply: Khimenko Victor: "Re: Kerneld vs. kmod in 2.2.x"