Re: [nfs - lockd] mutt / elm (possible solution)

Jamie Lokier (lkd@tantalophile.demon.co.uk)
Thu, 18 Feb 1999 12:24:10 +0000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Anonymous: "Re: Binary compatability is about ADMINISTRATION!"
Previous message: Sergio Brandano: "scsi DVD-RAM"

Aaron Tiensivu wrote:
> > I am not quite sure right now, but I remember having tried
> > nolock using automount, and got log messages indicating
> > "option not supported" (I have to check tomorrow morning
> > at work).
>
> Try this with Mutt:
>
>./configure --enable-flock --disable-fcntl

Hey, that looks like a good way to lose mail over NFS.

flock() does local locking only. Is bad if mail is delivered by a
different machine to the one reading the mail...

-- Jamie

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Anonymous: "Re: Binary compatability is about ADMINISTRATION!"
Previous message: Sergio Brandano: "scsi DVD-RAM"