> > rank(long long int) >= rank(long int) >= rank(int) >= rank(short int)
> > >= rank(char)
>
> If that definition has been changed the C9X committee are broken. On X86
> for example short=long in size. Anyone who expects all the compilers to
^^^^^^^^^^
I assume you didn't mean that :)
> change their object sizes is to say the least misguided.
Especially on architectures which don't have four or five different
integer sizes...
Matthew.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/