Re: Interrupts not being raised.

Ingo Molnar (mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu)
Fri, 12 Feb 1999 13:39:59 +0100 (CET)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Dominik Kubla: "New mailing list for the discussion of performance monitoring on LINUX"
Previous message: Philip Blundell: "Re: Interrupts not being raised."

well, it should be the number of vector, which is:

0x20 + irq on 2.0 and UP 2.1
the vector number in the boot log belonging to that IRQ

-- mingo

On Fri, 12 Feb 1999, Philipp Rumpf wrote:

> > <initialize the card>
> > asm volatile ("int $11"); // raise IRQ11
>
> Shouldn't that be "int $0x73" ?
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Dominik Kubla: "New mailing list for the discussion of performance monitoring on LINUX"
Previous message: Philip Blundell: "Re: Interrupts not being raised."