Re: Where is bfd.h?

Keith Owens (kaos@ocs.com.au)
Mon, 08 Feb 1999 20:30:23 +1100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Peter Waltenberg: "Modems and the + + + bug."
Previous message: Till Harbaum: "Re: No user space access during irq?"
Maybe in reply to: Allison, Bob: "Where is bfd.h?"
Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: No user space access during irq?"
Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: No user space access during irq?"
Reply: MOLNAR Ingo: "Re: No user space access during irq?"

On Mon, 8 Feb 1999 10:55:07 +0200 (EET),
Catalin BOIE <util@deuroconsult.ro> wrote:
>I try to compile ksymoops but it complains about bfd.h.
>
>Can you tell me where is it?

/usr/include/bfd.h is part of the binutils package. I had assumed that
(a) everybody installed binutils and (b) binutils always supplied
bfd.h. It now looks like at least one of those assumptions is wrong.
The ksymoops README will be updated.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Peter Waltenberg: "Modems and the + + + bug."
Previous message: Till Harbaum: "Re: No user space access during irq?"
Maybe in reply to: Allison, Bob: "Where is bfd.h?"
Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: No user space access during irq?"
Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: No user space access during irq?"
Reply: MOLNAR Ingo: "Re: No user space access during irq?"