Re: *** Draft 6 - Press Release ***

Kyle R. Rose (krose@theory.lcs.mit.edu)
Thu, 21 Jan 1999 12:44:54 -0500


> Please don't ask him to waste time approving/condemning a press release.
> He has far more important - and interesting perhaps - things to do.

I don't believe anyone was suggesting that. I'm guessing that Linus will
choose to release whatever he wants. I was under the impression that the
purpose of this process was to bring ideas to the table so Linus could make his
own decision.

> * Greater performance than the already legendary linux 2.0, especially while

Always capitalize "Linux."

> * Easy access to documents stored on NTFS-format hard disks.

"NTFS-format hard disks"? Ugh. Why not NTFS partitions or NTFS disks?

> As of now, technical users can download this update from the Internet.

"Technical users" still bothers me. I like Peter's suggestion of "This update
is available from <blah>" better.

> With Euro currency support

I missed something here. =)

> and Y2K compliance, Linux is ready for the next millennium.

I still have problems with Y2K crap, but if that's what people wanna hear....

> and cost-effective Internet groups.

Definte "internet group" for me.

> Linux makes over 25 percent of all web servers
> work,

This is very awkward sounding. I've heard statements like it before, but
I don't necessarily think this is the best way to do it. How about "25 percent
of all web sites run on Linux servers" or something to that effect.

> In a competitive examination of Linux conducted by Microsoft Corporation,
> Vinod Valloppillil writes that Linux is "Trusted in mission criticial
> environments. Linux has been deployed in mission critical, commercial
> environments with an excellent pool of public testimonials." He or his
> coauther Josh Cohen also state that Linux "is trusted in mission critical
> applications, and - due to it's open source code - has a long term
> credibility which exceeds many other competitive OS's."

Ugh... too many "mission critical"'s. And get rid of "He or his coauther
[sic]." Besides spelling "author" in a nonstandard way, this sounds really
awkward. I would simply get rid of the first quote entirely.

When two people write an article, you refer to _both_ of them as having written
it, not either. Both are responsible for the entire article, so you assume
they collaborated on every word.

> "I'm no longer nervous talking to enterprise customers about Linux,"
> John Paul, Senior Vice President at Netscape Communications, told Wired.

I like this a lot.

I'm nitpicking, but you can only make a press release once. Better for it to
be perfect, if such a thing can be achieved. =)

Kyle

--
Kyle R. Rose                          "They can try to bind our arms,
Laboratory for Computer Science        but they cannot chain our
MIT NE43-309, 617-253-5883             minds or hearts..."
http://web.mit.edu/krr/www/                              Stratovarius
krose@theory.lcs.mit.edu                                 Forever Free

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/