> b) "gives good performance on 12 processor" implies to me as a consumer
> poor performance from 13 to 64 :) or maybe even 2-11...
Supports != scales well. Different bottlenecks come into play on different
sizes. I don't know where the number 12 came from, but your change
excludes scalability problems at all. Dishonest. OTOH 'good performance'
says nothing, so... <shrug>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/