Re: unresolved symbols in devpts.o [2.2.0pre7]

Riley Williams (rhw@BigFoot.Com)
Mon, 18 Jan 1999 15:50:52 +0000 (GMT)


Hi Peter.

>>> Building devpts as a module is important for testing, but perhaps
>>> it can be officially dropped now. Makes sense, I guess. Enough
>>> people have screwed this one up.

>> Are there multiple options to select devpts?

>> If not, how does one build the kernel without support for modular
>> devpts whilst simoultaneously building devpts as a module?

> Simultaneously, no, but you can build a kernel first, and you won't
> be able to insert the module.

Ah...yes, of course...

Sorry, I apparently misunderstood this thread...

Best wishes from Riley.

---
 * ftp://ftp.MemAlpha.cx/pub/rhw/Linux
 * http://www.MemAlpha.cx/~rhw/kernel.versions.html

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/