Re: How about we just let all inode numbers on FAT be zero?

Itai Nahshon (nahshon@actcom.co.il)
Mon, 18 Jan 1999 03:22:45 +0200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: AVermedia TVPhone 98 and bttv"
Previous message: Kurt Garloff: "Re: Linux and physical memory"
Maybe in reply to: Colin Plumb: "How about we just let all inode numbers on FAT be zero?"

Would it be OK to fail unlink and rename when the file is in use?

I think this is acceptable for foreign file systems (vfat,msdos,smb) but
not for umsdos.

Itai

-- Itai Nahshon nahshon@actcom.co.il Also nahshon@vnet.ibm.com

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: AVermedia TVPhone 98 and bttv"
Previous message: Kurt Garloff: "Re: Linux and physical memory"
Maybe in reply to: Colin Plumb: "How about we just let all inode numbers on FAT be zero?"