Re: [PROGRESS!] A simple way to lock up 2.2.0-pre7

Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
17 Jan 1999 18:39:25 GMT


Bingo!

Good debugging, I'm thankful and impressed.

In article <Pine.LNX.4.02A.9901170751140.4394-100000@mikeg.weiden.de>,
Mike Galbraith <mikeg@weiden.de> wrote:
>
> 925 add_wait_queue(&tty->read_wait, &wait);
> 926
> 927 if (down_interruptible(&tty->atomic_read)) {
> 928 remove_wait_queue(&tty->read_wait, &wait); /*MIKEDIDIT*/
> 929 return -ERESTARTSYS;
> 930 }

I would suggest the simpler fix of just moving the "add_wait_queue()"
until after the down_interruptible test - that way there is nothing to
remove, and we really only want the read_wait queue to be around the
while-loop that follows.

Anyway, thanks for noticing and fixing it,

Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/