Re: How about we just let all inode numbers on FAT be zero?

G. Allen Morris III (gam3@209.239.200.201)
Sat, 16 Jan 1999 18:46:08 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: How about we just let all inode numbers on FAT be zero?"
Previous message: Damon Buckwalter: "Re: Security hole in console driver?"
Maybe in reply to: Colin Plumb: "How about we just let all inode numbers on FAT be zero?"
Next in thread: G. Allen Morris III: "Re: How about we just let all inode numbers on FAT be zero?"

Why can't the FAT offset be used?

Allen

---------------------------------
G. Allen Morris III

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: How about we just let all inode numbers on FAT be zero?"
Previous message: Damon Buckwalter: "Re: Security hole in console driver?"
Maybe in reply to: Colin Plumb: "How about we just let all inode numbers on FAT be zero?"
Next in thread: G. Allen Morris III: "Re: How about we just let all inode numbers on FAT be zero?"