> On Thu, 14 Jan 1999, G.W. Wettstein wrote:
>
> # This should be a non-issue in my opinion. My team runs a bunch of
> #
> # Kernels don't get installed unless they are packed like above. This
> # doesn't have the advantage of the information being physically stuck
> # but I'm not sure if I see the advantage to that.
> And if you don't run a distribution that keeps information about installed
> package? What about that scenerio?
I responded back to Brandon a few minutes ago on this issue. I think
that this is the domain of proper system's administration. I happen
to use rpm for our Enjellic Server Distribution. There is nothing
that stops anyone from making sure that a reasonable nameing
convention gets used and that things important to figuring out what
wrong follow this convention.
> G'day!
> -- n i c h o l a s j l e o n
Greg
}-- End of excerpt from "Nicholas J. Leon"
As always,
Dr. G.W. Wettstein Enjellic Systems Development - Specialists in
4206 N. 19th Ave. intranet based enterprise information solutions.
Fargo, ND 58102
Phone: 701-281-1686 EMAIL: greg@wind.enjellic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Samba was detected as "Samba" by WinNT 4.0 Workstation and PageMaker 6.5
was slow like hell. Now I managed to have it detected as "WinNT 4.1 Server"
and it's much faster."
-- (Ein Schelm, wer Boeses dabei denkt)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/