Re: Building .config into the kernel

Nicholas J. Leon (nicholas@binary9.net)
Thu, 14 Jan 1999 20:12:56 -0500 (EST)


On Thu, 14 Jan 1999, G.W. Wettstein wrote:

# This should be a non-issue in my opinion. My team runs a bunch of
#
# Kernels don't get installed unless they are packed like above. This
# doesn't have the advantage of the information being physically stuck
# but I'm not sure if I see the advantage to that.

And if you don't run a distribution that keeps information about installed
package? What about that scenerio?

G'day!
-- n i c h o l a s j l e o n
elegance through simplicity*http://mrnick.binary9.net*nicholas@binary9.net
good fortune through truth*roaming:njllm@email.msn.com*ICQ#2170994*U+($++)
TRA#6805*not all questions have answers*pseudogeek:P+++($++)L+($++)W=lm@b9
trust no-one with an iq under 150*understand yourself before trying others

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/