RE: [patch] arca-vm-19 [Re: Results: Zlatko's new vm patch]

Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@e-mind.com)
Fri, 15 Jan 1999 00:02:17 +0100 (CET)


On Thu, 14 Jan 1999, Fred Reimer wrote:

> It would not be possible to implement for 2.2.0, because it's frozen except

What Heinz is asking for has nothing to do with stability. I think it's
trivial to do what he needs without having to reinsert the buffer_max
limit. I think that arca-vm-20 only need an:

echo 5 2 4 32 128 512 >/proc/sys/vm/pager

or a:

echo 3 2 4 32 128 512 >/proc/sys/vm/pager

to work well for Heinz. Heinz could you confirm that? If understand well
your problem is a too much heavy swapout even if there's a lot of
freeable buffer memory?

> bugs right? But, would it be possible/desireable to have different
> algorithms selectable as part of the kernel build process? Are their

Sure it's possible but I think it would raise a big mess. I think it's
very better to have only one algorithm and have it very well tested from
everybody.

Andrea Arcangeli

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/