Re: Building .config into the kernel

Neil Conway (nconway.list@ukaea.org.uk)
Thu, 14 Jan 1999 16:41:28 +0000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Guest section DW: "Re: (un)corrupted ext2 partitions"
Previous message: Al Youngwerth: "Update: 2.0 kernels, tulip driver, crashes and reboots (long)"
Maybe in reply to: Oliver Xymoron: "Building .config into the kernel"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Building .config into the kernel"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Building .config into the kernel"

MOLNAR Ingo wrote:
>
> On Thu, 14 Jan 1999, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
>
> > Hi Ingo,
> >
> > I went through this argument with Oliver yesterday ...
> >
> > Config Language is not bash.
>
> ok. A 7.8K .config gets compressed to 2.1K via gzip --best, thats quite
> good already.

Right: that's quite a few positive replies regarding something like
/proc/config.gz.

Anyone prepared to argue against it?

Neil

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Guest section DW: "Re: (un)corrupted ext2 partitions"
Previous message: Al Youngwerth: "Update: 2.0 kernels, tulip driver, crashes and reboots (long)"
Maybe in reply to: Oliver Xymoron: "Building .config into the kernel"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Building .config into the kernel"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Building .config into the kernel"