> My question is, what would have to be done to get the advantages of the lower
> DEF_PRIORITY without trashing the implementation of 'niceness'?
What is wrong with something in-between? E.g. assuming a HZ of 1000, then
why not use, say:
#define DEF_PRIORITY (2*HZ/100)
Shouldn't that in general cut timeslots into 1/10th, and still allow
niceness?
Egil
-- Email: egil@kvaleberg.no Voice: +47 22523641, 92022780 Fax: +47 22525899 Mail: Egil Kvaleberg, Husebybakken 14A, 0379 Oslo, Norway Home: http://www.kvaleberg.no/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/