Re: [PATCH] Partition table wrong with 2048 byte/sector

Meelis Roos (mroos@tartu.cyber.ee)
Mon, 11 Jan 1999 05:16:17 +0200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: Results: pre6 vs pre6+zlatko's_patch vs pre5 vs arcavm13"
Previous message: Sang Kang: "Re: Official kernel stance on EGCS?"
In reply to: Jim Pick: "Re: VESAfb question"

JS> The (tiny) patch below fixes this for the 4 primary partitions. It
JS> is against 2.2.0pre5ac1 and can be easily extended to handle extended
JS> partitions as well (I don't have media for testing). Please consider
JS> including into 2.2.0.

Do extended partitions need something similar (if they exist on a
2048-byte media)? If yes, the patch should fix this too.

-- Meelis Roos (mroos@tartu.cyber.ee)

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: Results: pre6 vs pre6+zlatko's_patch vs pre5 vs arcavm13"
Previous message: Sang Kang: "Re: Official kernel stance on EGCS?"
In reply to: Jim Pick: "Re: VESAfb question"