> So it seems that Linux 2.2.0 isn't stable with loadable modules, at least
> not on the PC164. Any evidence to the contrary?
It's definately stable on the Intel architecture; my machine runs
2.2.0pre4 with all but the necessities compiled as modules, and it's been
rock-solid. I use the machine for cross-compiling 68k test kernels so it
gets a good workout too.
-- Network Administrator | FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC. mich.com, Inc. | -- The motto of the Ankh-Morpork City Watch 248-442-1000 x212 | (Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/