So, what might account for this embarrassingly dramatic disparity?
Does BSD have an incedibly better inode cache? Is this a known
bug? Is it fixed in the next release? :-)
We had a rather poor cache of file system objects in 2.0.x, yes.
For this reason, I'd be really interested if things are the same with
one of the current 2.2.0 pre-release kernels.
Later,
David S. Miller
davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/