Re: [OFFTOPIC] Gnumenclature was Re: IBM, was never Re: Linux Kernel

Edward S. Marshall (emarshal@logic.net)
Mon, 4 Jan 1999 22:48:50 -0600 (CST)

On Mon, 4 Jan 1999, Khimenko Victor wrote:
> In <Pine.LNX.4.04.9901040006120.27272-100000@reflections.eng.mindspring.net> Todd Graham Lewis (tlewis@mindspring.net) wrote:
> TL> On Sun, 3 Jan 1999, Khimenko Victor wrote:
> TL> Unless you want to use the Berkeley libc, which is unencumbered and perfectly
> TL> suitable for use under Linux.
>
> Of course ! In this case this will be BSD/Linux, not GNU/Linux :-)

We're waaaaaay offtopic for linux-kernel, but I'm actually rather curious;
has anyone taken the userspace portion of one of the BSD spins, and ported
it to run under a Linux kernel? A literal "BSD/Linux", as it were?

Sounds like it would be a rather interesting result. ;-)

-- 
Edward S. Marshall <emarshal@logic.net>       [ What goes up, must come down. ]
http://www.logic.net/~emarshal/               [ Ask any system administrator. ]


    Linux labyrinth 2.2.0-pre4 #1 Sun Jan 3 13:28:42 CST 1999 i586 unknown
        10:45pm up 1 day, 7:26, 4 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/