> On Fri, Jan 01, 1999 at 06:38:48PM -0500, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
> > In message <199901012231.RAA19512@x15-cruise-basselope.mit.edu>, Kev writes:
>
> > | Because SCSI is better.
> > +--->8
> >
> > Paranoid, are we? :-)
>
> I just want a statement from a (E)IDE guy why there is no
You have got your answer........there is one, I have got it, but it will
not go into 2.2.0 due to more needed testing........the very thing you
are asking for is not stable yet..........Thus Linus will not take it.
I have about 250K of ide code that I consider stable, but will only make
it into 2.3.X due to the time crunch.
> "eide-[add|remove]-single-device blah blah" proc-interface
> (I meen device re-probing not if-reprobing).
> This could make the life of notebook users (with removable disk/floppy/cdrom)
> much easier...
Why not try and write the patch youself, since I don't have a test bed?
> Does nobody else miss this cool SCSI feature under IDE ?
> Isn't Linux-SCSI better because of this ? ;-}
>
> --
> ciao -
> Stefan
>
> Stefan Traby phone: +43-3133-6107-2
> Mitterlasznitzstr. 13 fax: +43-3133-6107-9
> 8302 Nestelbach mailto://stefan@sime.com
> Austria
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
Cheers,
Andre Hedrick
The Linux IDE guy
The APC UPS Specialist for Linux
http://www.dyer.vanderbilt.edu/server/udma/
http://www.dyer.vanderbilt.edu/server/apcupsd/apcupsd-3.5.2.bin.tar.gz
You just need a bigger hammer, or learn how to swing the one you have better.
(C) me.....
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/