> I thought the only downside to UNFSD was it's lack of threading, making
> it slow for heavy use. A clone based version would fix this, no?
I seem to remember a discussion a year or so ago about there being some
inherantly unsolvable problems with allowing userland to handle nfs
locking. On the other hand, my memory is well known for being buggy. :-)
I also don't think the difference in speed is due to threading alone, the
improvements in speed for a single request is enormous, with knfsd we are
able to saturate a 10Mbit link, unfsd was not even close.
Peter
-- Peter Svensson ! Pgp key available by finger, fingerprint: <petersv@psv.nu> ! 8A E9 20 98 C1 FF 43 E3 07 FD B9 0A 80 72 70 AF <petersv@df.lth.se> ! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Remember, Luke, your source will be with you... always...
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/