Re: [patch] ad1848.c and opl3sa2.c

Ben Hutchings (womble@ferret.lmh.ox.ac.uk)
Sun, 3 Jan 1999 20:50:11 +0000 (GMT)


On Sat, 2 Jan 1999, Andrew Kieschnick wrote:

>
> These patches are against 2.2.0-pre3.
>
> ad1848.c: add back 2 lines that disappeared sometime after 2.1.131 so
> CS4231 gets detected as CS4231 and not CS4248
> opl3sa2.c: report unknown chipset, but go ahead and act like its an
> opl3sax. (Works for whatever flavor opl3sa I've got)
<snip>

My OPL3SAX appears to have version number 7. I guess that the `version
numbers' 1, 2 and 4 may actually be flag values, and that it might be
reasonable to test them in the order 4, 2, 1 in order to identify the
chip. Does that sound plausible?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/