Re: > Re: Linux threads -- as seen in NT Magazine

C S Hendrix (shendrix@escape.widomaker.com)
Wed, 16 Dec 1998 21:49:02 -0500


In message <199812162335.KAA29017@vindaloo.atnf.CSIRO.AU>, Richard Gooch writes
:

>
> No delay. The lock/unlock operations provide more than enough delay.
> You can pack a fair number of normal instructions into a spinlock
> operation. If all you're doing is inserting an entry into a list,
> for example, that is an operation that could probably fit into on
> lock/unlock cycle.

I don't suppose you could point out some code that does this.
I'm having a hard time seeing where this would be put in.

I tried to find some books covering spin locks and similar things
but didn't get much at the local Barnes N Noble. Someone said
there were papers on it but I'd like something like a Stevens
book that had it covered.

--
Shannon - shendrix@widomaker.com - www.widomaker.com - Linux 2.0.x
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"If he didn't inhale, then where did he get all that hot air?"

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/