Re: Linux 2.1.131ac8

Peter T. Breuer (ptb@it.uc3m.es)
Sun, 13 Dec 1998 01:47:13 +0100 (MET)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux 2.1.131ac8"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Writing a new filesystem driver."
In reply to: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: 2.1.130 mem usage."
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux 2.1.131ac8"

"A month of sundays ago Jordan Mendelson wrote:"
>
> Don't suppose force umount (umount -f) support (for NFS specifically) could
> be added to that list. If an NFS server you are mounted to goes down for an
> extended period of time... you are basically screwed with the kernel
> kernels.

Can't one do what I do now with the 2.0.* kernels? Oh no!

(ipalias for down server, unmount the nfs mount, down the alias - all
automatic).

Peter

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux 2.1.131ac8"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Writing a new filesystem driver."
In reply to: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: 2.1.130 mem usage."
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux 2.1.131ac8"