Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Re: Linux login security approaches

Mohsin_Ahmed (mosh@sasi.com)
10 Dec 1998 13:50:47 GMT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: [PATCH] VM improvements for 2.1.131"
Previous message: Mike Jagdis: "Re: 2.1.131-ac5 - I2O is great to have but does not build..."
Maybe in reply to: Michael K Vance: "[OFF-TOPIC] Re: Linux login security approaches"

Someone wrote:
> NT4 has no C2 certifications under its belt. NT3.51 had one.

- NT3.51 is awaiting one,
- NT3.5 got it (No networking installed).
The guy who certified it, is now suing MS, search for his home page.

See the nice reference - Inside Windows NT5, 2nd ed, David Solomon,

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: [PATCH] VM improvements for 2.1.131"
Previous message: Mike Jagdis: "Re: 2.1.131-ac5 - I2O is great to have but does not build..."
Maybe in reply to: Michael K Vance: "[OFF-TOPIC] Re: Linux login security approaches"