Re: [OFFTOPIC] Y2k compliance

Matthias Urlichs (smurf@noris.de)
8 Dec 1998 16:27:43 +0100

msackton@cs.brandeis.edu writes:
>
> Except cal also shows Feb 29, 1000 as existing
>
February 1000
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29

So what? That's entirely correct. The only-if-%400 rule wasn't in effect
then...

-- 
Matthias Urlichs  |  noris network GmbH   |   smurf@noris.de  |  ICQ: 20193661


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/