>
> Hello Rik, I'm Sorry but 'cal' isn't a document displaying
> a known starndards bodies authorship .
> Also being common knowledge isn't a publication of the standard.
Where is the document "displaying a known standards bodies authorship" that
that says if the is not coloured blue, but red, in the afternoon only, then
tomorrow is going to be a fine day?
You don't need such legal crap for matters that are accepted as common
knowledge.
> All I'm asking for is a known definition for the derivation of
> leap year . There has has to be one somewhere .
> Otherwise how did 'cal' get its definition ?
I believe this has already been posted in words, C preprocessor macros,
double-dutch and swahili.
Please drop this thread before we start debating how long a leap year is if
the earth starts rotating backwards around Uranus. It has nothing to do with
the kernel.
-- Matt- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/