Re: /proc/pci, lspci etc.

Martin Mares (mj@ucw.cz)
Tue, 1 Dec 1998 22:07:13 +0100


Hello,

> Yes, but it is like saying that we don't need route or netstat -rn because there
> is /proc/net/route. The /proc/bus/pci/devices is good only if you know all ids
> by heart.

If we compare the situation to what we have with routing, we now get exactly
the same -- for routes you have /proc/net/route and the `route' command to
display it in human-readable format, for PCI you have /proc/bus/pci/devices
and lspci.

It's _really_ not sane to store table of all existing PCI devices in the
kernel along with their names. The era of just a few PCI devices where
/proc/pci was a possibility (although not a good one) is gone...

Have a nice fortnight

-- 
Martin `MJ' Mares   <mj@ucw.cz>   http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/
Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth
"IBM = International Band of Magicians"

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/