Re: Seperating kernel archs

Horst von Brand (vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl)
Mon, 23 Nov 1998 12:34:04 -0300


"Matthew D. Pitts" <mpitts@suite224.net> said:
> Jonathan,
> > I read somewhere, sometime ago, that there was the hint of an idea
> > floating around to seperate the kernel architectures, in order to
> > decrease bandwidth and download time. Has anyone looked into this
> > further?

The architecture-specific parts of the kernel tarball are a rather small
fraction, so the reduction isn't that large. Plus knowing that
kernel-core-2.1.129 goes with kernel-i386-2.1.128 and kernel-sparc-2.1.125
and ... is just not worth it. Or distribute all in sync, then each kernel
hacker _will_ download everything: How else check if this stupid bug in
asm-i386 is also in asm-sparc et al, and propagate the change as needed?
And the nice job of splitting up each patch for the different archs.

Not useful.

> Not really. From my own experiences, (with Caldera OpenLinux) what happens
> is this; patches from Linus won't apply to COL without serious work if you
> just have i386, etc. Linus says no. He has a system that works for him, why
> change it?

That's just another point.

-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                       mailto:vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl
Departamento de Informatica                     Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria              +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile                Fax:  +56 32 797513

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/