Re: Linux V2.1.128 localhost performance

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Sat, 21 Nov 1998 16:07:56 +0000 (GMT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux-2.1.129.."
Previous message: Pat St. Jean: "Re: Intel microcode fixes [OFF-TOPIC]"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: Linux V2.1.128 localhost performance"

> Thats a TCP/scheduling bug in 2.1.x - someone modified the algorithms
> used to schedule wakeups without really understanding the "deep magic"
> in the 2.0.x one. Im assuming it'll get fixed
>
> If it's not fixed in 2.1.129, then I don't have any idea what you are
> talking about Alan. So someone either verify the problem goes away in
> 2.1.129 or Alan explain yourself more thoroughly. Thanks.

2.1.126 got 70K/second bursts mixed in with decent speed

2.1.129 reports 30235KB/second

Let me adjust the tense of my statement ;)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux-2.1.129.."
Previous message: Pat St. Jean: "Re: Intel microcode fixes [OFF-TOPIC]"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: Linux V2.1.128 localhost performance"